<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Frederick Brooks / Ruby on Rails smackdown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chaddickerson.com/blog/2005/08/25/frederick-brooks-ruby-on-rails-smackdown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chaddickerson.com/blog/2005/08/25/frederick-brooks-ruby-on-rails-smackdown/</link>
	<description>A little bit technology, a little bit rock-n-roll</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 00:50:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bozo the Clown</title>
		<link>http://www.chaddickerson.com/blog/2005/08/25/frederick-brooks-ruby-on-rails-smackdown/comment-page-1/#comment-232867</link>
		<dc:creator>Bozo the Clown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chaddickerson.com/blog/?p=18#comment-232867</guid>
		<description>I think Brooks&#039; idea was that there was no single tool that would improve general programming productivity by an order of magnitude (~10x).  

But in a specialized area, you can certainly improve productivity 10x or more by replacing stupidly inappropriate key development tools with a more appropriate one.  Say, for a specific web development project replace Fortran and winsock with Ruby and Rails, if those latter tools are much better for the particular project.

But this is still very dependent on your special situation -- it is not a *general* improvement, it is a special-case improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Brooks&#8217; idea was that there was no single tool that would improve general programming productivity by an order of magnitude (~10x).  </p>
<p>But in a specialized area, you can certainly improve productivity 10x or more by replacing stupidly inappropriate key development tools with a more appropriate one.  Say, for a specific web development project replace Fortran and winsock with Ruby and Rails, if those latter tools are much better for the particular project.</p>
<p>But this is still very dependent on your special situation &#8212; it is not a *general* improvement, it is a special-case improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Ramm</title>
		<link>http://www.chaddickerson.com/blog/2005/08/25/frederick-brooks-ruby-on-rails-smackdown/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ramm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 19:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chaddickerson.com/blog/?p=18#comment-144</guid>
		<description>I just posted a piece on my blog about Fred Brooks , and Ruby on Rails.

http://compoundthinking.blogspot.com/2005/10/silver-bullet-on-rails.html

My take on it is that Rails certianly does make you more productive, and when you combine it with other things like itterative development, small teams to reduce communicaiton overhead, and unit testing, you are very likely to find a 10x increase in productivity.  

--Mark Ramm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just posted a piece on my blog about Fred Brooks , and Ruby on Rails.</p>
<p><a href="http://compoundthinking.blogspot.com/2005/10/silver-bullet-on-rails.html" rel="nofollow">http://compoundthinking.blogspot.com/2005/10/silver-bullet-on-rails.html</a></p>
<p>My take on it is that Rails certianly does make you more productive, and when you combine it with other things like itterative development, small teams to reduce communicaiton overhead, and unit testing, you are very likely to find a 10x increase in productivity.  </p>
<p>&#8211;Mark Ramm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
