<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Collecting software methodologies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chaddickerson.com/blog/2006/08/16/collecting-software-methodologies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chaddickerson.com/blog/2006/08/16/collecting-software-methodologies/</link>
	<description>A little bit technology, a little bit rock-n-roll</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 00:50:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: manz</title>
		<link>http://www.chaddickerson.com/blog/2006/08/16/collecting-software-methodologies/comment-page-1/#comment-9146</link>
		<dc:creator>manz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 05:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chaddickerson.com/blog/?p=165#comment-9146</guid>
		<description>In my experience even though we  have lot methodologies in hand ultimately many companies tend to follow gut feeling to cruise the project ahead. Methodologies in blue print goes to trash .Probably XP made it self a big hit because it is simple</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience even though we  have lot methodologies in hand ultimately many companies tend to follow gut feeling to cruise the project ahead. Methodologies in blue print goes to trash .Probably XP made it self a big hit because it is simple</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
